Skip to main content

Comparative study of insulin resistance surrogate indices to predict mild cognitive impairment among Chinese non-diabetic adults

Abstract

Objective

The study aims to investigate the associations of triglyceride glucose (TyG), TyG combined with body mass index (TyG-BMI), metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR), the triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-C), and the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in individuals without diabetes aged 45 and above.

Methods

The most recent data in this study were from a cohort study, which sourced samples from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, spanning 2011 to 2018. The four indices’ associations with MCI risk were analyzed using logistic regression. The predictive capacity was measured using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

Over a 7-year follow-up, 1,261 individuals (31.34%) of the 4,027 participants developed MCI. Logistic regression analysis revealed significant associations between these surrogate indices and MCI. The findings for the highest quartile compared with the lowest quartile were as follows: TyG: 1.24 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.49); TyG-BMI: 1.38 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.68); METS-IR: 1.50 (95% CI: 1.09, 2.06); TG/HDL-C: 1.34 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.64). ROC analysis revealed that TyG, TyG-BMI, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR demonstrated excellent discriminatory power for MCI, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.83), 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.83), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.84), and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.84), respectively. The four indices showed stronger ability to predict MCI risk in females compared to males.

Conclusion

Elevated levels of four indices are positively correlated with MCI risk. TyG-BMI and METS-IR demonstrate stronger capabilities in identifying MCI across both male and female populations. This suggests that early intervention in patients with elevated IR surrogate indices may help reduce the MCI.

Introduction

Dementia is primarily manifested as cognitive impairment, often accompanied by significant decline in social functioning, severely impacting daily life and autonomy [1]. With the accelerating global aging process, dementia prevalence is increasing worldwide, particularly in China [2,3,4]. According to The Lancet Commission, dementia may develop in middle age, although symptoms may appear at different stages [5]. In China, 608 million people are 45 years or older, comprising 43.44% of its total population [6], indicating a potentially high prevalence of dementia [7]. Given the current lack of effective treatments to significantly slow dementia progression, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is considered a phase in the transition from normal cognitive functioning to dementia, characterized by subtle yet identifiable cognitive decline [8]. Therefore, timely recognition of individuals at elevated risk for MCI is essential. Early intervention measures, including cognitive therapy, moderate-intensity exercise, and dietary adjustments, can substantially lower dementia risk and conserve healthcare resources [9].

Insulin resistance (IR) is characterized by a reduced biological response to insulin in target organs [10], which may result in elevated blood glucose levels and an increased risk of obesity, cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, and other chronic conditions [11]. In this study, IR levels were assessed using measures independent of insulin. These included triglyceride glucose (TyG), TyG combined with body mass index (TyG-BMI), metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR), and triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-C) [12,13,14,15]. Earlier research has estimated the associations of these IR proxy measures with cognitive decline. For instance, in a large community-based sample study, it has been determined that elevated levels of TyG predict significant cognitive decline in the subsequent five years [16]. Since the TyG-BMI index is a global indicator in IR, it reflects the overall metabolic condition of subjects. TyG-BMI levels have been documented in research to be associated significantly with rapid cognitive decline, particularly in overweight and obese individuals [17]. The METS-IR and TG/HDL-C have demonstrated associations with cognitive decline across diverse populations [18, 19].

Previous research has primarily concentrated on populations with diabetes or the broader populace, which includes diabetics. This focus narrows the applicability of their findings to non-diabetic groups. Additionally, discrepancies in sample composition, the duration of follow-up, and the methods of statistical analysis across these studies diminish their comparability. In response, this study hypothesizes that IR surrogate indices can predict MCI in elderly individuals without diabetes, and that TyG-related indices are better at identifying MCI patients than TyG itself. The innovative aspect of this research lies in its use of the nationally representative China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) database to specifically analyze the predictive value of these IR surrogate indices and their clinical significance in non-diabetic populations. This article aims to provide fresh insights for the early detection and intervention of MCI, thereby filling existing research gaps and aiding in the development of strategies to prevent cognitive deterioration in this demographic.

Methods

Study design

The CHARLS database provided the data for this analysis. Employing multi-stage stratified random sampling throughout mainland China, the survey ensured participant consent. The initial survey occurred in 2011, with 17,705 participants undergoing physical examinations and completing questionnaires. Subsequent assessments were conducted biennially, with Waves 2, 3, and 4 occurring in 2013, 2015, and 2018, respectively. The average follow-up period was 6.26 years. Exclusion criteria included: age under 45 years (418 individuals); MCI diagnosis at baseline (1,352 individuals); history of diabetes or lipid-lowering medication use at baseline (507 individuals); missing data on IR surrogate indices (5,077 individuals); absence of cognitive data across all follow-up waves (4,031 individuals); lost to follow-up (1,151 individuals); and missing over 20% of covariate data (1,142 individuals) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Research and design flow chart

Definitions of four surrogate indices

This study collected data on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) to calculate the four surrogate indices, as follows: TyG = ln [(TG (mg / dL) × FPG (mg / dL) / 2] [20]; TyG-BMI = TyG × BMI [21]; METS-IR = ln [(2 × FPG (mg / dL)) + TG (mg / dL)] × BMI / ln (HDL-C (mg / dL)) [14]; TG / HDL-C = TG (mg / dL) / HDL-C (mg / dL) [15].

MCI definition

CHARLS designed a questionnaire to assess cognitive function, focusing on Word Recall Test (WRT) and Mental Status Test (MST) [22]. The WRT included immediate and delayed recall tests, each scoring up to 20 points. The immediate recall score was determined by the number of words immediately recalled by the participant, while the delayed recall score depended on the number recalled after completing a depression scale survey, lasting approximately 4 to 10 min. The MST involved the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-10) and a graphic drawing task. Both the serial subtraction and date orientation tasks of the TICS-10 were valued at 5 points and thus summed to 10 points in total. The graphic drawing task asked for the exact copying of a figure and was valued at 1 point. Thus, the maximum score for cognition would be 31 points and it was summarized from MST and WRT scores [23]. Repeated cognitive assessments at each follow-up used the same methods.

MCI was defined according to the aging-associated cognitive decline (AACD) criteria [24]. Specifically, MCI involves a total score (WRT and MST combined) that falls more than one standard deviation (SD) below the mean for the participant’s age group [24]. Participants aged 60 and over were grouped by five-year intervals, and those meeting the AACD criteria were classified as having MCI. See Supplementary Table 1 for detailed classification criteria.

Diagnosis of diabetes

As per Chinese guidelines for type 2 diabetes, the diagnostic criteria include any of the following [25]: (1) Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5%; (2) FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L; (3) a physician’s diagnosis of diabetes, or (4) use of diabetes medication or insulin.

Covariates

The covariates included sociodemographic factors, behavioral factors, health status factors, and psychological health factors. Sociodemographic factors encompassed age, gender, educational level, marital status (married/unmarried), and residence (urban/rural). Behavioral factors consisted of social activities, smoking history, and alcohol history. Health status factors included waist circumference, BMI, and various chronic diseases (hypertension, dyslipidemia, cancer, cardiovascular disease, liver disease, chronic lung disease, psychiatric disorders, digestive system diseases, kidney disease, arthritis or rheumatism, and asthma) reported by subjects in response to the question, “Have you ever had any of the following chronic diseases or pain?” Laboratory examination results comprised HbA1c, FPG, TG, HDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and total cholesterol (TC). The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was utilized to evaluate psychological health [26].

Statistical analysis

The distribution characteristics of the variables guided the representation of continuous data as either means with SD or medians alongside interquartile ranges (IQR). For comparative analysis between groups, T-tests or rank-sum tests were utilized as deemed necessary. Categorical variables were shown in frequencies (%) and analyzed using the χ2 test. Associations between four specific indices and the incidence of MCI were explored through a multivariable logistic regression approach. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was applied to measure the predictive ability of the four indices for MCI, with the highest Youden index determining the most effective threshold. Statistical evaluations were conducted utilizing EmpowerStats (version 4.2). The P < 0.05 exhibited significance.

Results

Participants characteristics

The research encompassed 4,027 subjects, of which 1,261 had been recently diagnosed with MCI. The demographic breakdown showed 2,041 males and 1,986 females, averaging 63.69 ± 8.53 years in age.Compared to participants without MCI, those with MCI were generally older, more likely to be female, had lower levels of education, were more frequently unmarried, had a history of alcohol consumption and smoking, participated in fewer social activities, and predominantly resided in rural areas. They also had shorter sleep durations, larger waist circumferences, higher BMIs, and a higher prevalence of chronic diseases. Furthermore, the MCI group had higher CES-D scores, while their Global Cognition Scores, WRT scores, and MST scores were lower. Additionally, distinct differences in laboratory measures, including HbA1c, FPG, LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG, were observed. Levels of the four IR surrogate indices were higher in individuals with MCI than in those without. (Table 1)

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population

Correlation between four IR surrogate indices and MCI risk

During the collinearity screening, substantial collinearity was observed among the exposure variables. To mitigate the impact of multicollinearity on model stability and result interpretability, these variables were excluded from simultaneous inclusion in further regression analyses. Moreover, due to strong correlations between BMI, TC, and HDL-C and these IR indicators, these variables were also omitted from the logistic regression models (Supplementary Table 2). Model 1 showed a positive correlation between the four IR surrogate indices and MCI. Subsequent adjustments for age and gender in Model 2 indicated that the highest quartiles of TyG, TyG-BMI, METS-IR, and TG/HDL-C had a 1.36, 1.70, 1.32, and 1.79-fold increase in MCI risk, respectively, relative to the lowest quartiles. In Model 3, which included comprehensive adjustments, the relationships between these indices and MCI risk persisted as statistically significant (P < 0.05). (Table 2)

Table 2 Association of Baseline IR Surrogate Indices with Incident MCI

AUC and cut-off points of four IR surrogate indices for predicting MCI

According to Table 3; Figs. 2 and 3, TG/HDL-C and METS-IR demonstrated relatively high AUC values of 0.83, with optimal cut-off values of 2.66 and 33.22, respectively. Subsequently, the AUC values for TyG-BMI and TyG were both 0.82. For both men and women, the AUC values for TyG-BMI and METS-IR exceeded those of the other two indices (Fig. 3A). The best cut-off values for men were 181.20 and 33.36, while for women, they were 198.36 and 33.15 (Fig. 3B).

Table 3 AUC and cutoff values of four IR surrogate indices for MCI Risk Prediction
Fig. 2
figure 2

ROC for different IR surrogate indices to predict MCI

Fig. 3
figure 3

ROC curves of different IR surrogate indices for predicting MCI across genders. (A) Males (B) Females.

Discussion

In this longitudinal investigation, the incidence of MCI among non-diabetic individuals aged 45 and older was found to be 31.3%, with occurrence rates of 29.3% in males and 33.3% in females. This study is the first analysis to propose the four IR surrogate indices as potential indicators for MCI within this demographic. Notably, TyG-BMI and METS-IR outperformed the other two indices in identifying MCI across different genders.

IR surrogate indices are closely associated with metabolic disorders [27,28,29], and these indices have also been used to predict cognitive decline. For instance, Tong et al. found that TyG and TyG-BMI were linked to MCI among those diagnosed with type 2 diabetes [30]. Zhao et al. conducted a study on individuals aged 60 and older and determined that elevated TG/HDL-C levels were significantly linked to decreased cognitive test scores [18]. Importantly, even in the absence of diabetes, IR has been shown to contribute to cognitive decline. Recent studies indicate that METS-IR in non-diabetic individuals is closely related to metabolic disorders [31], which are significantly associated with cognitive decline [32]. Additionally, other studies indicate that IR indices have a significant impact on the ability of prediabetic individuals to restore normal blood glucose levels [33]. These findings corroborate those observed in the non-diabetic population and emphasize the importance of these indices in assessing the risk of MCI.

Research also suggests that IR indices have varying predictive powers depending on the population characteristics. For example, Wang et al., in their study involving a Chinese population, found that elevated TyG levels correlated with a greater likelihood of cognitive decline in males, especially those below 60 years old, while no association could be seen in females [34]. On the other hand, the current study suggested that IR surrogate indices performed better in females than in males from the perspective of predictive performance. Several issues related to the design of this study can explain this disagreement. The pioneering work by Wang et al. was carried out on elderly subjects within the wider population, but this study specifically was targeted on nondiabetic subjects in order to avoid interference with the correlation between IR and cognitive function due to diabetes. However, this has given a more valid estimate of predictive capability regarding those IR surrogate indices in a non-diabetic setting. This research followed participants from 2011 to 2018, and this duration was longer than the four-year follow-up conducted by Wang et al. from 2011 to 2015. In effect, long-term changes in cognitive function could be captured with great detail alongside the associated pattern with IR indices. Afilalo et al. also reported the same findings, as the increased risk for IR was directly proportional to the increase in the chances of MCI, especially in female patients. Women are more susceptible to the ill effects of IR due to socioeconomic factors like lifestyle, hormonal changes, and fat distribution that increase susceptibility to cognitive decline [35]. Moreover, Chen et al. found that females are more vulnerable to IR-induced cognitive decline compared with males [36]. These findings suggest the importance of wider application of surrogate indices of IR in predicting MCI among female populations. These differences need more explanation based on extensive studies across different genders. Additionally, it is imperative that future research expand its focus to include a variety of age groups, ethnicities, and backgrounds to enhance understanding of the IR surrogate indices’ utility and efficacy across diverse populations.

Subsequent ROC analyses revealed that TyG-BMI and METS-IR exhibit excellent forecasting power for MCI compared to other indices among both genders. Existing literature supports that TyG-BMI, by incorporating BMI, offers a more precise estimation of an individual’s fat accumulation [37]. Specifically, obesity impacts insulin sensitivity through multiple pathways, including adipocytes’ secretion of pro-inflammatory agents and insulin antagonists, substantially elevating IR risk. METS-IR integrates various non-insulin lab indices and anthropometric data, such as FG, TG, and HDL-C, which collectively reflect an individual’s metabolic health status [38]. Metabolic disorders are closely linked to the risk of MCI, and METS-IR effectively identifies these disorders, thereby assessing the risk of MCI. Additionally, IR is associated with chronic inflammation and oxidative stress, which have been proven to negatively impact brain health [39]. Consequently, METS-IR, as an IR surrogate, indirectly indicates levels of inflammation and oxidative stress, thereby predicting cognitive function alterations [40].

Study strengths and limitations

First, the study data were derived from CHARLS, a comprehensive nationwide survey with significant representativeness. This source provides valuable supplementary data on non-diabetic individuals aged 45 and above, particularly within the Chinese population in Asia. Second, the study employed a cohort design, enabling the establishment of causal links between the four IR surrogate indices as independent risk factors and MCI. Additionally, these four IR surrogate indices are readily obtainable and simple to calculate, offering low screening costs, which supports their large-scale application. These indices are instrumental in research and serve as effective tools for the early detection and intervention of MCI in clinical practice, thereby improving the motivation for early diagnosis and treatment among individuals and healthcare providers.

However, this research acknowledges several limitations. First, constraints of the CHARLS database restricted the adjustments for certain confounding factors, such as dietary habits, medication use, and detailed information on MCI complications. Second, the diagnosis of MCI is self-reported, which can present subjective bias because participants’ memory and comprehension abilities may affect the accuracy of the information provided. Moreover, the population mainly originated from the older generations of Chinese individuals and requires further verification among external groups in order to generalize the findings to other regions and countries. IR surrogate indices, on the other hand, though valuable in assessing IR and the risk of its related diseases, are far less sensitive in measuring the physiological mechanisms that pertain to IR compared to techniques such as the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and the quantitative insulin sensitivity index. The results thus have to be approached with caution and much reservation.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that four surrogate indices of IR have significant clinical value in predicting MCI in non-diabetic elderly populations. Notably, TyG-BMI and METS-IR show the best predictive performance regardless of gender. These findings suggest that high values of these IR indices might necessitate regular follow-ups of cognitive performance as a means to apply early interventions with the purpose of decelerating cognitive decline. Given the accessibility and low cost of these indices, they could potentially be integrated into community and primary healthcare systems to enhance large-scale screening and early diagnosis of MCI, thus providing better overall patient care and health management.

Data availability

This study’s analysis used publicly available datasets, accessible at http://charls.pku.edu.cn.

Abbreviations

TyG:

Triglyceride glucose

TyG-BMI:

Triglyceride glucose combined with body mass index

METS-IR:

Metabolic score for insulin resistance

TG/HDL-C:

Triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio.

MCI:

Mild cognitive impairment

CHARLS:

China health and retirement longitudinal study

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

AUC:

Area under the curve

IR:

Insulin resistance

FPG:

Fasting plasma glucose

TG:

Triglycerides

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

WRT:

Word recall test

MST:

Mental status test

TICS-10:

Telephone interview for cognitive status-10

HbA1c:

Hemoglobin A1c

BMI:

Body mass index

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

TC:

Total cholesterol

CES-D:

Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale

SD:

Standard deviation

AACD:

Aging-Associated Cognitive Decline​

IQR:

Interquartile range

References

  1. Gauthier S, Morais JA, Webster C, Wong K, Massoud F, Rosa-Neto P et al. World Alzheimer report 2021: journey through the diagnosis of dementia. 2021. https://www.alzint.org/resource/world-alzheimer-report-2021/. Accessed 20 May 2024.

  2. World Health Organization, Dementia. 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia. Accessed 15 May 2024.

  3. Nichols E, Steinmetz J, Vollset SE, Fukutaki K, Chale J, Abd-Allah F, et al. Global dementia cases set to triple by 2050 unless countries address risk factors. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(2):e105–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00249-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang B, Liu Q, Li JP, Lin SN, Wan HJ, Yu ZW, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for dementia and mild cognitive impairment among older people in Southeast China: a community-based study. BMC Geriatr. 2024;24:466. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12877-024-05054-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;396:413–46. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook. 2022. 2022. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2022/indexeh.htm. Accessed 15 Jan 2024.

  7. Jia L, Du Y, Chu L, Zhang Z, Li F, Lyu D, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older in China: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5:e277–85. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30185-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kasper S, Bancher C, Eckert A, Forstl H, Frolich L, Hort J, et al. Management of mild cognitive impairment (MCI): the need for national and international guidelines. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2020;21:579–94. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/15622975.2019.1696473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Q, Zhou S, Zhang J, Wang Q, Hou F, Han X, et al. Risk assessment and stratification of mild cognitive impairment among the Chinese elderly: attention to modifiable risk factors. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023;77:521–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yaribeygi H, Farrokhi FR, Butler AE, Sahebkar A. Insulin resistance: review of the underlying molecular mechanisms. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:8152–61. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/jcp.27603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo S. Insulin signaling, resistance, and metabolic syndrome: insights from mouse models into disease mechanisms. J Endocrinol. 2014;220:1–23. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1530/JOE-13-0327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Simental-Mendia LE, Rodriguez-Moran M, Guerrero-Romero F. The product of fasting glucose and triglycerides as surrogate for identifying insulin resistance in apparently healthy subjects. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2008;6(4):299–304. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1089/met.2008.0034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ke P, Wu X, Xu M, Feng J, Xu H, Gan Y, et al. Comparison of obesity indices and triglyceride glucose-related parameters to predict type 2 diabetes mellitus among normal-weight elderly in China. Eat Weight Disord. 2021;26:589–96. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s40519-021-01238-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bello-Chavolla OY, Almeda-Valdes P, Gomez-Velasco D, Viveros-Ruiz T, Cruz-Bautista I, Romo-Romo A, et al. METS-IR, a novel score to evaluate insulin sensitivity, is predictive of visceral adiposity and incident type 2 diabetes. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178:533–44. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1530/EJE-17-0883.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McLaughlin T, Reaven G, Abbasi F, Lamendola C, Saad M, Waters D, et al. Is there a simple way to identify insulin-resistant individuals at increased risk of cardiovascular disease? Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:399–404. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.03.085.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bai W, An S, Jia H, Xu J, Qin L. Relationship between triglyceride-glucose index and cognitive function among community-dwelling older adults: a population-based cohort study. Front Endocrinol. 2024;15:1398235. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fendo.2024.1398235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meyer MR, Clegg DJ, Prossnitz ER, Barton M. Obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes: sex differences and role of oestrogen receptors. Acta Physiol. 2011;203:259–67. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/apha.2011.203.issue-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao X, Li S, Wu Z, Liu Z, Xu Y, Zhang X. The relationship between triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023;108(1):123–33. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1210/clinem/dgaa092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Othman F, Bahari H, Yazid MD. The role of oxidative stress and inflammation in obesity and its impact on cognitive impairments—a narrative review. Antioxidants. 2023;12(5):1071. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/antiox12051071.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu Z, Wang J, Li Z, Han Z, Miao X, Liu X, et al. Triglyceride glucose index and carotid atherosclerosis incidence in the Chinese population: a prospective cohort study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;31(7):2042–50. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.numecd.2021.03.027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Er LK, Wu S, Chou HH, Hsu LA, Teng MS, Sun YC, et al. Triglyceride glucose-body mass index is a simple and clinically useful surrogate marker for insulin resistance in nondiabetic individuals. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0149731. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0149731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cao L, Zhao Z, Ji C, Xia Y. Association between solid fuel use and cognitive impairment: a cross-sectional and follow-up study in a middle-aged and older Chinese population. Environ Int. 2021;146:106251. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Levy R. Aging-associated cognitive decline. Working Party of the International Psychogeriatric Association in collaboration with the World Health Organization. Int Psychogeriatr. 1994;6:63–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1017/S1041610294001680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Richards M, Touchon J, Ledésert B, Ledesert B, Ritchie K. Cognitive decline in ageing: are AAMI and AACD distinct entities? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999;14:534–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. China Diabetes Society. 2019 Chinese Diabetes Society (CDS) guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes. Beijing: Chinese Diabetes Society; 2019. https://www.diabetes.org.cn/. Accessed 10 May 2024.

  26. Kiiti Borges M, Oiring de Castro Cezar N, Silva Santos Siqueira A, Yassuda M, Cesari M, Aprahamian I. The relationship between physical frailty and mild cognitive impairment in the elderly: a systematic review. J Frailty Aging. 2019;8:192–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.14283/jfa.2019.29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hong S, Han K, Park CY. The insulin resistance by triglyceride glucose index and risk for dementia: population-based study. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021;13:9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13195-020-00758-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. García AG, Urbina Treviño MV, Villalpando Sánchez DC, Aguilar CA. Diagnostic accuracy of triglyceride/glucose and triglyceride/HDL index as predictors for insulin resistance in children with and without obesity. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019;13:2329–34. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.dsx.2019.05.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang A, Tian X, Zuo Y, Chen S, Meng X, Wu S, et al. Change in triglyceride-glucose index predicts the risk of cardiovascular disease in the general population: a prospective cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20:113. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12933-021-01305-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tong XW, Zhang YT, Yu ZW, Pu SD, Li X, Xu YX, et al. Triglyceride glucose index is related with the risk of mild cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022;15:3577–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Arjmand B, Ebrahimi Fana S, Ghasemi E, Kazemi A, Ghodssi-Ghassemabadi R, Dehghanbanadaki H, et al. Metabolic signatures of insulin resistance in non-diabetic individuals. BMC Endocr Disord. 2022;22:212. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12902-022-01130-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wei B, Dong Q, Ma J, Zhang A, Liu J, Zhao M, et al. The association between triglyceride-glucose index and cognitive function in nondiabetic elderly: NHANES 2011–2014. Lipids Health Dis. 2023;22:188. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12944-023-01959-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Liang X, Xing Z, Lai K, Zhang Y, Chen H, Wu J, et al. Sex differences in the association between metabolic score for insulin resistance and the reversion to normoglycemia in adults with prediabetes: a cohort study. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024;16:183. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13098-024-01430-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang K, Xu L, Liu L, Zhan S, Wang S, Song Y. Sex differences in the association between the change in triglyceride-glucose index and cognitive decline: a population-based cohort study. J Affect Disord. 2022;316:42–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Afilalo J. Frailty in patients with cardiovascular disease: why, when, and how to measure. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2011;5:467–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ferreira LS, et al. Gender differences in the association of insulin resistance with cognitive function in older adults: a cross-sectional study. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021;15:505–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.dsx.2021.01.018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Liang X, Zhang S. TyG-BMI as a marker of insulin resistance and its associations with metabolic disorders. J Diabetes Res. 2022;2022:5487936. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1155/2022/5487936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Guerrero-Romero F, Simental-Mendía LE, González-Ortiz M, Martínez-Abundis E, Ramos-Zavala MG, Hernández-González SO, et al. The triglyceride-glucose index, HOMA-IR, and the metabolic syndrome. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15:44–56. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12933-016-0358-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kellar D, Craft S. Brain insulin resistance in Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(9):758–66. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30231-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Li J, Li Y, Yang X, et al. METS-IR and its impact on cognitive performance: insights from a cross-sectional study of elderly individuals. Front Endocrinol. 2024;15:723412. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fendo.2024.723412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study sincerely thanks Peking University for supplying the open data resources, Jian Bo Chang for his financial contributions, and all investigators involved in this work.

Funding

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Bureau of Yan’an City (No. 2014kw-17).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YC., designed the study. Z.X., Z.C., Y.G., and W.P. handled data collection and analysis. Y.C., Z.X., and Z.C. drafted the manuscript, while X.Z., Y.G., and P.W. provided critical revisions. All authors contributed to and approval of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoyan Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This cohort study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Peking University (IRB00001052–11015) and follows the ethical guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

All authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, Y., Xu, Z., Cui, Z. et al. Comparative study of insulin resistance surrogate indices to predict mild cognitive impairment among Chinese non-diabetic adults. Lipids Health Dis 23, 357 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12944-024-02353-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12944-024-02353-0

Keywords