Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 3 Threshold effect analysis between CMI and BMF

From: The relationship of cardiometabolic index with bowel movement frequency: an NHANES-based cross-sectional analysis

 

Fully adjusted model

β (95% CI)

Log likelihood ratio

Fitting by the two-piecewise linear model

  

Inflection point I

4.97

0.012

CMI < 4.97

0.30 (0.17, 0.43)

 

Inflection point II

11.75

0.002

CMI between 4.97 and 11.75

−0.78 (−1.33,−0.23)

 

CMI > 11.75

0.36 (0.03, 0.69)

 
  1. Note: Fully adjusted model: Adjustments were made for age, sex, race, education level, poverty income ratio, smoking, drinking, moderate activity, body mass index, diabetes, gastrointestinal diseases, hypertension, depression, sleep disorders, and dietary factors such as energy, total fat, moisture, dietary fiber, protein, carbohydrate, and caffeine; CI: Confidence intervals; CMI: Cardiometabolic index; BMF: Bowel movement frequency
Back to article page

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X