Fig. 5

LFPs of PVN and 1–24 h EPOC in Exp. 2. Note A, complete power spectrums (0–100 Hz, one representative spectrum of each group was shown). B, δ to β band (0–30 Hz). C, difference between groups on the fourth week. D, comparison between groups within each band; *, EH vs. EC, δ: F = 6.195, P = 0.003; α1: F = 5.468, P = 0.012; α2: F = 6.341, P = 0.015; β2: F = 9.483, P = 0.002;@, EH vs. EM, α2: F = 6.341, P = 0.005; β2: F = 9.483, P = 0.002. E, power spectrum for 300 s at 24 h after exercise on the fourth week. F, oxygen uptake of EPOC (1–24 h post training); *, EH vs. EC, F: 3.802 ~ 17.360, P: 0.001 ~ 0.014; #, EM vs. EC, F = 7.157, P = 0.013; @, EH vs. EM, F: 4.201 ~ 17.360, P: 0.001 ~ 0.011. G, oxygen uptake (1–12, 12–24 and 1–24 h post exercise); *, EH vs. EC, 1–12 H F = 14.617, P < 0.001, 1–24 H F = 6.488, P = 0.008; @, EH vs. EM, 1–12 H F = 14.617, P < 0.001, 1–24 H F = 6.488, P = 0.006. H, respiration quotient (1–24 h post training); *, EH vs. EC, F: 2.720 ~ 6.279, P: 0.002 ~ 0.046 @, EH vs. EM, F: 4.543 ~ 6.279, P: 0.009 ~ 0.047. I, respiration quotient (1–12,12–24 and 1–24 h post exercise); *, EH vs. EC, 1–12 H F = 3.969, P = 0.013, 1–24 H F = 3.473, P = 0.025. J, fat oxidation rate (1–24 h post training); *, EH vs. EC, F: 3.975 ~ 13.504, P: 0.001 ~ 0.047; @, EH vs. EM, F: 2.633 ~ 13.504, P: 0.001 ~ 0.040. K, fat oxidation rate (1–12,12–24 and 1–24 h post exercise); *, EH vs. EC, 1–12 H F = 6.598, P = 0.004, 1–24 H F = 5.278, P = 0.010; @, EH vs. EM, 1–12 H F = 6.598, P = 0.016, 1–24 H F = 5.278, P = 0.019