Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariate regression analysis for MetS

From: Association between visceral fat area and metabolic syndrome in individuals with normal body weight: insights from a Chinese health screening dataset

 

Crude model

Model I

Model II

OR (95%CI) P-value

OR (95%CI) P-value

OR (95%CI) P-value

VFA

1.02 (1.02, 1.03) < 0.001

1.08 (1.02, 1.14) < 0.001

1.13 (1.12, 1.25) < 0.001

VFA tertile

T1

Reference

Reference

Reference

T2

7.60 (5.01, 11.51) < 0.001

7.49 (4.92, 11.42) < 0.001

5.56 (3.52, 8.79) < 0.001

T3

40.45 (27.17, 60.21) < 0.001

44.87 (29.35, 68.58) < 0.001

30.33 (19.00, 48.43) < 0.001

P for trend

5.79 (5.05, 6.64) < 0.001

6.33 (5.38, 7.44) < 0.001

5.48 (4.57, 6.57) < 0.001

  1. Non-adjusted model adjusts for: None
  2. Model I adjust for: sex, age, ethnic group and marital status
  3. Model II adjust for: sex, age, ethnic group, marital status, current smoking, current drinking, BMI, TP, ALT, AST, BUN, and eGFR.VFA, visceral fat area; MetS, metabolic syndrome; OR, odd ratio; CI, confidence interval
Back to article page

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X